top of page

Must Read Electrochemistry Tutorials by Ananth and Colleagues!

Hey there, fellow electrochemistry enthusiast! 🧪✨

So, you've got these papers staring at you, huh?

 

Well, guess what?

 

They're not just regular papers where a random guy/girl boasts how he/she/they developed the world's best catalysts 😄😄😄; they could very well become your secret weapons to electrify your electrochemistry game! ⚡️💥

Give 'em a whirl! You won't regret it!

 

Why?

Because...

"Screening Catalysts/Materials with Better Accuracy and Precision Is as Important as Developing New and Better Ones," says Ananth!

And he probably is correct!!

Guiding light for a better future.jpg

**********************************************

15. A. Sengeni*, How Reliable Are the Overpotentials Reported in Energy Conversion Electrocatalysis? Catal. Sci. Technol., 2024, 14 (8), 2025-2039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D4CY00079J

Cy 1.png
d4cy90011a_page-0001.jpg

14. S. Anantharaj*, P. E. Karthik, and S. Noda, Ambiguities and best practices in the determination of active sites and real surface area of monometallic electrocatalytic interfaces Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2023, 634, 169-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.12.040

1-s2.0-S0021979722021889-ga1.jpg
X00219797.jpg

13. S. Anantharaj* and S. Noda, The importance of carefully choosing vertex potentials in hydrogen underpotential deposition Materials Today Energy, 2023, 32, 101234. 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.12.040

1-s2.0-S2468606922002921-ga1.jpg
1-s2.0-S2468606923X00021-cov200h.gif

12. S. Anantharaj*,  Prince JJ Sagayarj, Manova Santhosh Yesupatham, Roshini Arulraj, Karthik Eswaran, Karthikeyan Sekar, and Suguru Noda*, The Reference Electrode Dilemma in Energy Conversion Electrocatalysis: "Right vs Okay vs Wrong", Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2023, 11, 17699-17709.

https://doi.org/10.1039/D3TA03145D

Get.jpg
JMC A 2.png

11. S. Anantharaj* and S. Noda, How properly are we interpreting the Tafel lines in energy conversion electrocatalysis? Materials Today Energy, 2022, 29, 101123. 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2022.101123

1-s2.0-S2468606922001812-ga1_lrg.jpg
1-s2.0-S2468606922X00075-cov150h.gif

10. S. Anantharaj* S. Kundu, and S. Noda, Worrisome Exaggeration of Activity of Electrocatalysts Destined for Steady-State Water Electrolysis by Polarization Curves from Transient Techniques, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2022, 169, 014508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ac47ec

jesac47ec-ga.jpg
journal_cover.jpg

9. S. Anantharaj* and S. Noda, Dos and don’ts in screening water splitting electrocatalysts, Energy Advances 2022,1, 511-523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D2YA00076H

Get2.jpg
Get (1).jpg

8. S. Anantharaj* and S. Noda, iR drop correction in electrocatalysis: everything one needs to know!, Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2022, 10, 9348-9354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TA01393B

Get3.jpg
d2ta90095e_page-0001.jpg

7. S. Anantharaj*, H. Sugime, and S. Noda, Why shouldn’t double-layer capacitance (Cdl) be always trusted to justify Faradaic electrocatalytic activity differences? Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2021, 903, 115842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115842

1-s2.0-S1572665721008687-ga1_lrg.jpg
JEC.jpg

6. S. Anantharaj*, P. E. Karthik, and S. Noda, The Significance of Properly Reporting Turnover Frequency in Electrocatalysis Research! Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 23051-23067. 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202110352

anie202110352-toc-0001-m.jpg
anie202111515-toc-0001-m.jpg

5. Anantharaj et al., Alternating Current Techniques for a Better Understanding of Photoelectrocatalysts, 

ACS Catalysis 2021, 11, 20, 12763–12776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c03783

images_medium_cs1c03783_0010.gif
accacs.2021.11.issue-20.largecover.jpg

4. S. Anantharaj,* S. Noda*, M. Driess, and P. W. Menezess* The Pitfalls of Using Potentiodynamic Polarization Curves for Tafel Analysis in Electrocatalytic Water Splitting, ACS Energy Lett., 2021, 6, 4, 16071-1611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00608

nz1c00608_0004.webp
aelccp.2021.6.issue-4.largecover.jpg

3. S. Anantharaj,* and S. Noda, Appropriate Use of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy in Water Splitting Electrocatalysis, ChemElectroChem 2020, 7, 2297-2308.

 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202000515

celc202000515-toc-0001-m.jpg
celc202000486-toc-0001-m.jpg

2. S. Anantharaj,* and S. Kundu*, Do the Evaluation Parameters Reflect Intrinsic Activity of Electrocatalysts in Electrochemical Water Splitting?, ACS Energy Letters 2019, 4, 6, 1260–1264.

 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00686

nz-2019-00686j_0001.webp
aelccp.2019.4.issue-6.largecover.jpg

1. S. Anantharaj,* and S. Kundu*, Precision and correctness in the evaluation of electrocatalytic water splitting: revisiting activity parameters with a critical assessment, Energy and Environmental Science, 2018, 11, 744-771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE03457A

Get5.jpg
c8ee90021c_page-0001.jpg
bottom of page